Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0869120070090020118
±âÃÊ°£È£ÀÚ¿¬°úÇÐȸÁö
2007 Volume.9 No. 2 p.118 ~ p.124
Comparison of Surgical Hand Scrub Formulations and Scrub Methods for Antimicrobial Efficacy
Kim Myoung-Sook

Kim Kyung-Ja
Shin Young-Ran
Park Kwang-Ok
Mun Hyang-Mi
Jeong Jae-Sim
Kim Mi-Na
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare three surgical scrub methods-4% chlorhexidine gluconate(CHG) with brush, 4% CHG without brush, and waterless scrub using 1% CHG and 61% ethanol combination(alcohol-based agent)-for antimicrobial efficacy.

Methods: "Glove-juice technique" was used to evaluate microbial hand counts before surgical scrubs, 1 min and 3 hr after surgical scrubs.

Results: Waterless scrub using CHG and ethanol combination resulted in a 4.8-log reduction at 1 min and 4.0-log reduction at 3 hr. CHG without brush resulted in a 4.7-log reduction at 1 min and 3.3-log reduction at 3 hr. The traditional scrub using CHG with brush resulted in a 3.6-log reduction at 1 min and 0.8-log reduction at 3 hr. The waterless scrub and CHG without brush showed significantly higher log reduction(p<.05) than CHG with brush at 1 min and 3 hr after surgical scrub. Waterless scrub showed greater log reductions than CHG without brush, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups.

Conclusion: Waterless scrub using alcohol-based agent showed more persistent and immediate antimicrobial efficacy than either CHG with brush or CHG without brush.
KEYWORD
Surgical scrubs, Antimicrobial efficacy, Chlorhexidine gluconate, Ethanol
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed